20 August 2007

Brain imaging for pain in the courtroom

Law Professor Adam Kolber has an interesting paper on attempts to use brain imaging as evidence that a person is in fact in pain. The abstract:
Pain is a fundamentally subjective experience. We have uniquely direct access to our own pain but can only make rough inferences about the pain of others. Nevertheless, such inferences are made all the time by doctors, insurers, judges, juries, and administrative agencies. Advances in brain imaging may someday improve our pain assessments by bolstering the claims of those genuinely experiencing pain while impugning the claims of those who are faking or exaggerating symptoms. These possibilities raise concerns about the privacy of our pain. I suggest that while the use of neuroimaging to detect pain implicates significant privacy concerns, our interests in keeping pain private are likely to be weaker than our interests in keeping private certain other subjective experiences that permit more intrusive inferences about our thoughts and character

I expect to have a bit to say about this later when I've had the chance to digest the paper. And, yes, I'll share.